Early in my photojournalism career, one of my frustrations was that I sent my clients (newspapers and magazines) a lot of good pictures and they would only have room to publish one of them. And, sometimes, the one they ran with wasn't my favorite, or even close. It didn't take long for me to realize that my job was to get good pictures, what the publications did with them was their business and I had no control over it. That's not to say that I wouldn't passionately advocate for the picture I thought worked the best, I did. But the reality in the world of journalism is that the best images don't always show up in print. There are many factors that go into what ends up being published. The quality of the image isn't always at the top of the list. I have a lot of friends who are great photographers, but you wouldn't know it if all you saw was what ran in the paper they worked for.
In the case of the pictures in this post, it's less about the paper running the wrong photos and more about there being a number of good pictures that they just didn't have room for. But, the beauty of the internet is that I can put them out there to be seen. These are from a story I did last fall for The New York Times Travel section on hiking the Wonderland Trail at Mt. Rainier. They did a good job of running the photos - even ran one across two pages inside, bigger than I would have dreamed.
(Here's the link to the story as it ran online: http://travel.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/travel/04wonderland.html ) It was fun to shoot, fun to see my pictures run well and even more fun to be able to add a few to the mix with this post.
